Academia’s Critical Role in Climate Change

Academia’s Critical Role in Climate Change

Providing students with the education and deep understanding of the issues and capabilities is now even more crucial

Edward Mazria and Lindsay Rasmussen of Architecture 2030 respond to the B&C special issue EDUCATION & TRAINING: MAINSTREAMING ZERO CARBON. Professional design schools can provide the leadership needed to address what is this century’s greatest challenge – the preservation of a habitable planet. Providing students with new knowledge and capabilities is now even more critical if we are to act responsibly to stay within a 1.5˚C budget. 5 broad challenges for higher education are presented.

We are in the midst of many US and global calamities - climate change, COVID-19, and environmental, racial, and social injustices - each demanding immediate and sustained action. While 2020 has been an extremely challenging year, it has also been a year met by an increased awareness of these issues, as well as new innovations, dialog and achievements in addressing them.

Recent climate action has been motivated by accelerating global climatic impacts and an understanding of the dramatic difference between a 1.5˚C global warming limit and a 2˚C limit, and the global CO2 emission budgets (Rogelj et al., 2018) for meeting the 1.5˚C threshold. According to the IPCC, the global carbon budget, or the total amount of CO2 that can be released into the atmosphere while maintaining a good, or 67% probability, of limiting warming to 1.5˚C is now about 340 GtCO2. To meet this budget, global CO2 emissions must be reduced by 65% by 2030, and CO2 emissions completely phased out by 2040.

The good news is, if we act quickly and responsibly, we can stay within the 1.5˚C budget. We have all the tools, policies, strategies, products, and affordable renewable energy needed to do so as outlined in the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook 2020 which tracks energy production and consumption worldwide (Carbon Brief, 2020).

Governments are beginning to address these new targets. In December 2020 the UK Prime Minister announced their new target that aligns with the IPCC SR15 report, calling for a reduction in UK’s emissions by at least 68% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels (BEIS, 2020). Bold action is also being taken to address embodied carbon in construction as Oslo, Los Angeles, Mexico City, and Budapest commit to emissions reductions through the C40 Clean Construction Declaration, ‘pledging to work with industry to, at a minimum, halve emissions from construction projects in their cities by 2030’ (C40, 2020).

While significant action is currently underway in the profession, a paralleled action must now be accelerated within academia. Providing students with the education and deep understanding of the issues and tools they need as they enter the workforce is now even more critical.

Professional design schools are well poised to provide the leadership in higher education needed to address what we deem to be this century’s greatest challenge – the preservation of a habitable planet. Schools serve as unique laboratories for structuring an integrated response to complex physical, ecological, social, and economic concerns; and they can do so at a scale that is manageable, yet large enough to make a discernible difference. Focusing on the important role and positive impact education and training plays in meeting the Paris Agreement’s targets, addressing current and future climate impacts, and moving beyond zero-carbon to create Carbon Positive and socially just built environments will instill a sense of purpose and excitement in meeting the challenges of our time.

We specifically suggest that professional program core design studios immediately:

  • promote a deep understanding of the relationship between built and natural environments
  • reach across disciplines to cultivate a broader understanding of design and planning issues and solutions
  • engage social and environmental equity issues that recognize the consequences of design decisions
  • connect students with the profession by bringing in working professionals actively designing zero carbon buildings
  • incorporate zero carbon baseline requirements for all studio design projects. 

An abundance of positive examples already exist in both academia and the design professions. The Buildings & Cities special issue shows how education and training can develop ‘the capacities, capabilities and competences to rapidly decarbonize both new construction and the existing building stock’ (Stevenson and Kwok, 2020). Authors dive into issues of policy and cross-disciplinary collaboration, as well as passive design strategies, embodied carbon and the importance of reuse, recycling, and re-manufacturing of building products. Authors also address the need for addressing issues holistically, expanding beyond fundamentals of zero-carbon design and into social issues. We recommend using this special issue of Buildings & Cities as a stepping point for further action, collaboration, and conversations.

References

BEIS (2020) UK sets ambitious new climate target ahead of UN Summit. Press release from UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-sets-ambitious-new-climate-target-ahead-of-un-summit

Carbon Brief (2020). Solar is now 'cheapest electricity in history', confirms IEA. https://www.carbonbrief.org/solar-is-now-cheapest-electricity-in-history-confirms-iea

C40 Cities (2020) Oslo, Los Angeles, Mexico City and Budapest Commit to Clean Construction, Moving the Industry Towards a Sustainable Future.  Press release from C40 Cities. https://www.c40.org/press_releases/clean-construction-declaration-launch

Rogelj, J., D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler, L. Mundaca, R. Séférian, and M.V.Vilariño (2018). Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC and WMO. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

Stevenson, F., & Kwok, A. (2020). Mainstreaming zero carbon: lessons for built-environment education and training. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), pp. 687–696., p. 687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.84

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila

Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby

Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni

Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi

Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen

Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam

Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen

Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula

A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers

Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling

Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert

Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane

Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen

Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian

US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong

Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han

Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel

Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben

New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn

‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad

Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke

The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson

Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty

Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs

Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel

Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner

Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould

Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey

Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar

How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang

Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow

Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson

Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka

Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves

See all

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.

Join Our Community