By Jason Corburn (University of California, Berkeley, US)
The overlapping crises of climate change, COVID-19, and persistent social inequities are acutely felt in cities, particularly among the poor and already vulnerable. Urban climate justice demands a focused strategy to support the healing of these vulnerable communities while also creating new opportunities for them to co-lead more equitable climate resiliency strategies. COP-26 must address ‘healing cities for climate justice;’ or the need for urgent investments with (not on or for) already vulnerable people and places in order to eliminate existing suffering and urban traumas, while also planning for future prosperity.
What might a healing city for climate justice strategy look like in practice? We suggest this approach is critical for planetary well-being and the survival of the approximately one billion people living in self-built, informal settlements, often called slums (UN 2019). A healing cities for urban climate justice strategy can also move us closer to Sustainable Development Goals 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 13, among others (Corburn & Sverdlik 2017).
Consider: Nairobi, Kenya, a city of just under 5 million where about 65% live in self-built, informal settlements that lack access to basic, life-supporting infrastructure and services (Figure 1). In one slum called Mukuru, community-driven research was conducted by residents in partnership with local and international NGOs and universities (Corburn et al. 2019) which led to the community being designated a Special Planning Area (SPA) (Muungano Alliance 2021). This designation ensured a new redevelopment plan would be drafted with resident input and expertise, and that the improvement plan must address the multiple traumas afflicting Nairobi’s slum dwellers, including: climate change risks from flooding and disease, social and physical exclusion, lack of water, sanitation and energy infrastructure, secure tenure and environmental injustices from toxic dumping and localized air pollution (Horn 2021). The county government was also involved, as were national governmental institutions. Findings were shared with tens of Mukuru SPA ‘consortium’ partners and, with resident input, turned into an integrated upgrading plan. The improvement strategies included prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable, such as reducing flooding risks for the poorest of the poor living along river riparian areas, delivering water and safe sanitation to women, and creating new public spaces for youth to play, create and learn (Anderson 2014).
When COVID-19 emerged in 2020, the Nairobi Metropolitan Services (NMS) was empowered by the Kenyan government to lead the response in many informal settlements. Mukuru was one of the first places selected for investments, in part because residents were already mobilized, had already developed a plan and many built environment projects were ‘shovel ready’ (Weru & Cobbett 2021). Instead of just getting temporary services and treatment, which would have been typical during an emergency response, Mukuru received permanent, healing-focused, life-supporting built environment investments. Kilometers of roads, sidewalks and bicycle paths were tarmacked, connecting previously disconnected villages within the community and linking the entire settlement to services, jobs, schools, and the benefits of the entire city (Figure 2). Boreholes for clean water were drilled and water-access kiosks installed (ABC News 2021). A sanitary sewer main was completed and pipes serviced private toilets serving thousands of households. New hospitals were constructed in less than a year (All Africa 2021). Street lighting was installed for the entire settlement and new green and community spaces were identified. New social programs and school feeding programs were launched. Local people, especially youth, were employed to make these repairs. This was crucial, since the people who dreamed-up the transformation received both immediate employment and cash, while also gaining new skills that could provide them more permanent jobs (Kinyanjui 2021).
The Mukuru projects are promoting healing and urban climate justice by reducing vulnerability today while building the physical, social and governance infrastructure for resident prosperity moving forward (Sverdlik et al. 2019). While incomplete and an on-going project, Mukuru’s transformation reflects the values of how a city can invest in its least-well-off places and populations first, while delivering benefits to everyone (Ng’ang’a 2021).
As COP-26 considers strategies to reduce planetary suffering, the lessons from Mukuru must inform urban design and planning practice. First, practitioners must work with the poor and vulnerable communities to identify the toxic stressors (Figure 3) – or those inequalities contributing to suffering, trauma and disease – not rely on professional ‘experts’ alone (Corburn 2017). Next, residents, civil society groups, universities, and local governments must co-create actionable plans to support healing, which means focusing design and investments on reducing trauma and stress through a combination of physical infrastructure, social programs and democratic decision-making (Ellis & Dietz 2017). Third, professionals must practice humility and learn-by-doing with local people, not acting for or ‘on’ them. Finally, cities that heal and promote climate justice must adapt as they learn what is and is not supporting the well-being of the poor and marginalized communities. A one size fits all approach will not heal those suffering today, and will not contribute to prosperity for all moving forward.
ABC News. (2021). Vending machines bring safe, cheap water to Nairobi slums. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-18/kenya-water-vending-machines-mukuru-slums/100465320
All Africa. (2021). Kenyatta commissions five new hospitals in Nairobi. https://allafrica.com/stories/202107070114.html
Anderson, M. (2014). Nairobi’s female slum dwellers march for sanitation and land rights. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/oct/29/nairobi-slum-dwellers-sanitation-land-rights
Corburn, J. (2017). Urban place and health equity: critical issues and practices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020117
Corburn, J., Asari, M.R., Wagner, A., Omolo, T. Chung, B., Cutler, C. Nuru, S., Ogutu, B., Lebu, S. & Atukunda, L. (2019). Mukuru Special Planning Area: Rapid Health Impact Assessment. Berkeley: Center for Global Healthy Cities. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/591a33ba9de4bb62555cc445/t/5e6d77579988a61549be14a8/1584232291593/Mukuru+Nairobi+Health+Impact+Assessment+2019_UCB.pdf
Corburn, J. & Sverdlik, A. (2017). Slum upgrading and health equity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(4): 342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040342
Ellis, W.R., Dietz, W.H. (2017). A new framework for addressing adverse childhood and community experiences: the building community resilience model. Academic Pediatrics,17(7S):S86-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.011
Horn, P. (2021). Enabling participatory planning to be scaled in exclusionary urban political environments: lessons from the Mukuru Special Planning Area in Nairobi. Environment and Urbanization. doi:10.1177/09562478211011088
Kinyanjui, M. (2021). NMS projects slowly changing the face of Mukuru slums. The Star. https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2021-08-16-nms-projects-slowly-changing-the-face-of-mukuru-slums/
Muungano Alliance (2021) Mukuru SPA. https://www.muungano.net/mukuru-spa
Ng’ang’a, J. (2021). Projects to upgrade informal settlements on top gear. Kenya News Agency. https://www.kenyanews.go.ke/projects-to-upgrade-informal-settlements-on-top-gear/
Sverdlik, A., Mitlin, D. & Dodman, D. (2019). Realising the Multiple Benefits of Climate Resilience and Inclusive Development in Informal Settlements. New York: C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/C40-Climate-Resilience-Inclusive-Housing.pdf
United Nations. (2019). SDGs progress report: Goal 11. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/goal-11/
Weru, J. & Cobbett, W. (2021). Slum upgrading in Kenya: what are the conditions for success? Thomson Reuters News Foundation. https://news.trust.org/item/20210225133836-td97u
Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby
Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities
As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.
Unmaking Cities Can Catalyse Sustainable Transformations
Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.