Designing Cities with and for Girls

Beirut: Rehabilitated stair passage. Photo: Her City.
Beirut: Rehabilitated stair passage. Photo: Her City.

Involving women in urban development processes and decisions will make cities better for everyone.

Elin Andersdotter Fabre (UN Habitat) and Tove Levonen (Shared City Foundation) explain why cities need to be more inclusive for women. The UN Habitat ‘Her City’ project provides a participatory toolkit and process to include women in urban planning, design and development.

Why girls?

A decade ago, UN-Habitat (the United Nations Human Settlements Programme) initiated the Global Public Space Programme, focusing on inclusive public space planning and design. Since then, child-friendly urban public space design has become an increasingly hot topic around the world. However, the needs of girls (age 0-18) and young women (age 19-25) are particularly underrepresented in urban public space planning and design and that projects do not target them as a key user group. Even though the importance of including this group in urban public space development is clearly recognised in the Sustainable Urban Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda, women and girls in vulnerable areas are the most likely to be ‘left behind’.

To address that girls are among the most likely to be ‘left behind’ and rarely are consulted in rethinking their neighbourhoods or daily lives, Her City was initiated by UN-Habitat and the Shared City Foundation to provide tools to increase participation in urban development. Its purpose is to support urban development from a girl’s perspective by focusing on the use of gender and youth transformative tools and methods.

Her City is the result of the Urban Girls Movement initiative that started with a global mapping of best practices for gender inclusion in urban development back in 2017. These global learnings informed the process then piloted in the first project in Botkyrka in Sweden, testing a planning and design process that is gender, socio-economically and age sensitive.

Urbanism and gender

Already 55% of the world's population live in cities.1 The number is increasing steadily, particularly in intermediate cities and in sub-Saharan Africa. In many countries in the global North, the urbanisation rate has already exceeded 80%.2 This brings about enormous challenges both in terms of sustainability and equality, for example, with poverty becoming an increasingly urban phenomenon.

Among the most affected by inequalities are women in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban areas who experience oppression, lack of opportunities and social exclusion as a result. Women are also affected by the negative impact of climate change to a higher extent than men.3

In general, women and girls benefit less from urbanisation and urban spaces than men and boys.4 Women in cities globally face a range of specific barriers and vulnerabilities, which if not addressed in urban planning, can result in a form of gender-based discrimination. For example, women and girls are systematically excluded and deprived of basic infrastructure, services and opportunities. For example, 60% of women and girls feel unsafe in public spaces worldwide. It ranges from not feeling comfortable when taking a specific path to school or work, using public transport or accessing basic water, sanitation and livelihoods, to simply not spending time outside of home because public spaces are not welcoming or meeting the needs of young women and girls.

This vulnerability further increases when gender is coupled with other grounds for discrimination such as age, economic status, disabilities, minorities, ethnicity or sexual orientation. Women and minorities are unequally represented in decision-making processes, for example only 23% of government positions are occupied by women and only 10% of urban planners. This becomes as a barrier to women and girl’s participation in important processes such as climate-related urban planning and policy development. It is hoped that the Her City Toolbox can help change this.

The toolbox

On International Women’s Day 2021, the Her City Toolbox was launched and then rolled out in 20 partnership projects in Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and Europe. Today over 1200 users from 350 cities in 100 countries are registered on the platform and 300 independent initiatives worldwide using the toolbox.

The toolbox follows a unique process, a digital step-by-step guide on how to co-plan cities from a girl’s perspective. It is available for free on an open and digitally accessible platform. The 9 blocks represent the three phases of the urban development process and will guide you through the assessment, design and implementation phase. Each block contains a number of activities with detailed steps to follow in order to deliver on your Her City project.

The toolbox provides municipal professionals, urban actors and local decision-makers with a solid toolbox for mainstreaming youth, gender and socioeconomic perspectives by strategically involving girls and young women in urban planning, design and implementation. The toolbox has been introduced to 8,000 stakeholders and 1,000 professionals are proficient in using the tools. Besides, providing capacity building, UN-Habitat’s role is to support cities in facilitating the ongoing dialogue between professionals and citizens.

The results

The Her City process has shown the value of including underrepresented perspectives in local decision-making processes and physical planning and design of urban spaces. Well-planned public spaces - or participatory processes - open for all regardless of ethnic origin, ability, sexual orientation, age or gender. When these perspectives are included as well, the overall picture is more complete, solutions can be developed to fit the entire population, and decision makers are adequately informed to take long-term and sustainable decisions.

Girls and other disadvantaged groups prioritise the usage of public resources in a way that touches cross-cutting issues. When consulted, girls raise pressing urban planning issues such as crime prevention measures, ecosystem solutions, transport, access to education and healthcare. The results are inclusive and cost- efficient public spaces that work for everyone. Though the long-term impact is too early to measure, we can see tendencies in our partnership projects where the process has led to lasting impact on the physical public space with consequences for the entire community.

Among the 20 projects, 10 public spaces have been rebuilt so far, providing space for 52,000 people living in direct proximity. Despite different geographical contexts, similar priorities and solutions are proposed by the girls. Girls were found to have different priorities and design solutions than boys, valuing developments that have 'common good' and long-term sustainable consequences for both “people” and 'planet'.

The top solutions proposed by girls were greening of the urban environment (trees, flowers, parks urban agriculture, beehives, and ecosystem services), increased arts provision (library, stages, interactive lights and outdoor theatres), public spaces (ponds, pools and fountains chill and recreational areas, meeting points and playgrounds) increased public amenities (water drinking taps, public toilets, pedestrian streets. cycle paths and waste and recycling facilities).

Besides improvement in the physical environment, the process also showed value for the different target groups involved - the girls, but also for other stakeholders involved such as local decision-makers, urban professionals, or academia:

  • The process was observed to strengthen the girls' trust in society and public authorities and the ability to influence their local environment increased civic engagement among some of the girls. In addition, the close collaboration with the multi-stakeholder group also serves as an introduction to the labour market, shows the inner workings of a variety of professions, and provides insight into local democracy processes.
  • The feedback from participating professionals indicates that working in close partnership with girls and ‘non-professionals’ has served as an eye-opener to understand the space and needs from the girls’ perspective. Her City therefore continues to build capacity among multi-stakeholder professionals.
  • Her City was developed together with researchers into an academic course that was first piloted at the Technical University of Crete in Greece and at the Bauhaus University in Germany showing that live Her City projects can inform and build capacity among young scholars by training the urbanists, planners, designers and architects of tomorrow.
  • The structural impact of Her City initiatives has influenced policy or governance processes. In South Africa, for the first time positive discrimination of women was allowed in public procurement. In Peru accessibility regulations is being reviewed from a more inclusive lens. In Palestine, a nationwide public space policy has been developed; and in Sweden. In Botkyrka where it all started, the recommendations by the girls are informing new projects by the municipality, private actors and community organisations.

The new normal

Involving girls in urban development will make the city better for everyone. When girls are given the trust and opportunity, they plan and design with diversity and different needs in mind. Participatory processes are key for planning a city that can work for everyone. Through Her City we have had the possibility to re-think and systematically restructure and speed up the transition to an inclusive and sustainable urban environment by broadening priorities and points of view. Her City should be the new normal.

Notes

1 UN Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities.

2 World Bank. (n.d.) Urban population (% of total population).

3 UN Women. (2022). Explainer: how gender inequality and climate change are interconnected.

4 UN-Habitat. (2022). Cities for Girls, Cities for All: Report from the Vinnova Innovation for Gender Equality Project.

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila

Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby

Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni

Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi

Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen

Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam

Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen

Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula

A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers

Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling

Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert

Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane

Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen

Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian

US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong

Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han

Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel

Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben

New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn

‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad

Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke

The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson

Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty

Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs

Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel

Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner

Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould

Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey

Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar

How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang

Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow

Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson

Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka

Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves

See all

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.

Join Our Community