
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/commentaries/gendered-city.html
Why urban spaces need to be reimagined from an intersectional perspective, incorporating the voices and experiences of women
Cities are hubs of economic activity and cultural vibrancy, however, urban growth policies and city governance that fail to consider gender and poverty have exacerbated socio-economic disparities, exclusion, and segregation. Nourhan Bassan (GamingX) discusses some of key themes from her forthcoming book "The Gendered City". She argues that it is imperative to understand the historical context of urban design, to critically examine gender disparities in cities, and to advocate for women's rights in shaping and accessing urban spaces.
"While women's right to the city was largely left unattended until the recent past, it is important to understand that women have always been active participants in the building of cities. Still, many challenges remain. The progress and success of city policies depend on the capacity to ensure equal conditions and opportunities for people of all genders." - Ana Falú (URBANET 2017)
In cities across the world, women of all ages and identities face a range of barriers and vulnerabilities: gender-based discrimination, violence, poverty, expectations of unpaid care work, limited control over assets, and unequal participation in private and public decision-making. For instance, 'Cities Alive: Designing cities that Work for Women' (Arup and UNDP 2022) highlights that only around 1% of women in Africa own their own land, 97% of young women in the UK have experienced sexual harassment in public, 20% of women in India are employed, 95% of women in Glasgow in Scotland, feel unsafe visiting parks at night, 29% of women in business globally are in senior decision-making positions, and 17% of the global population find it unacceptable when a female family member has a job.
The causes of inequality are many, though an underrepresentation of women in local governance institutions and urban design decisions is a major factor, along with there being inadequate accountability mechanisms for urban and municipal policies to address gender inequality. For instance, globally, women make up less than 5% of mayors and only 20% of city councilors. There are pockets of better practice, for instance, there are around double this number of women leaders in the capital cities of Tunis, Freetown, Baghdad, Paris, Bucharest, and Washington DC, though these remain exceptions.
Women perceive and experience cities differently from men and use public spaces in distinct ways. Urban design has been aligned with the work and life patterns of men, meaning our cities often make women unsafe, fail to provide for their basic needs, and restrict their social and economic opportunities. As a result, billions of women are underserved by the urban environments in which they live and work. For instance, women from impoverished and insecure neighborhoods are more likely to commute during late or early hours for educational opportunities work or such as working as vendors in open markets. These routines expose them to the risk of sexual assault. Women often experience feelings of insecurity and vulnerability when navigating public spaces, particularly at night. The lack of well-lit areas, inadequate public transportation, and the absence of safe public toilets further restrict women's freedom to move and fully participate in urban life. Women are also more likely to have inadequate access to basic services, including safe and affordable clean water, sanitation, drainage, electricity, solid waste management, as well as educational, health, reproductive, and social services (IWPR n.d.).
External factors are therefore influencing women's ability to fulfill their basic needs in cities, and the gendered division of labour within the urban economy often places women in low-paid, exploitative, and demanding work while they also maintain their households and communities. This results in a 'triple burden' for women, encompassing reproduction, production and community care. Our urban designs exacerbate this challenge.
In contemporary urban theory, cities are understood as social and historical constructs that are perceived differently by individuals. However, the consequences of historical biases in favour of designs for male needs are still evident today.
The concept of the right to the city, as proposed by Lefebvre, provides a theoretical framework for advocating urban citizenship rights and participation in decision-making processes (King 2019). It is a radical framework that calls for the transformation of urban spaces and decision making structures. This requires understanding social life and networks, unraveling the ways in which individuals practice citizenship in their everyday lives, and recognizing the agency of marginalized groups in driving urban transformation. This means that designing feminist cities involves reimagining urban spaces from an intersectional perspective, incorporating the voices and experiences of women, and considering factors such as race, class, sexuality, and disability so cities can become more inclusive and responsive to their needs. This will mean that design interventions that improve conditions for women in urban areas will be easier to achieve, such as well-lit streets, accessible public transportation, and gender-responsive infrastructure, all of which can enhance women's safety, mobility, and overall quality of life.
Embracing a gender-responsive approach to urban planning and design ensures that the entire community can access the opportunities provided by cities and generates broader social, economic, and environmental advantages. Addressing the persistent gender disparities in urban settings is urgent, especially considering the rapid pace of global urbanization and the need for reconstruction due to conflicts and climate change. Collaboration among planners, designers, city authorities, community groups, and investors is crucial to effectively tackle these challenges and create resilient and inclusive urban environments that foster social change and yield economic benefits for all.
Gender equality in urban spaces won't happen without challenging gender stereotypes, fostering inclusive dialogue, and actively involving women in shaping urban policies. This requires addressing both the physical environment and the social and cultural norms that perpetuate gender inequities. By creating spaces that embrace diversity, promoting women's leadership, and challenging patriarchal structures, cities can become vibrant and inclusive environments that benefit everyone.
Arup and UNDP. (2022). Cities Alive: Designing cities that work for women. https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/cities-alive-designing-cities-that-work-for-women
IWPR: Institute for Women's Policy Research. (n.d.). Gender, Urbanization and Democratic Governance White Paper. National Democratic Institute. www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/Gender%20Urbanization%20and%20Local%20Governance%20White%20Paper.pdf
King, Loren. (2019). Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the City. In S.M. Meagher, S. Noll & J.S. Biehl [eds] Handbook of Philosophy of the City. Routledge. pp.76-86. 10.4324/9781315681597-7
URBANET. (2017). Women's Right to the City: Reflections on Inclusive Urban Planning. https://www.urbanet.info/womens-right-to-the-city/
Reorganising specification practice for component reuse: an exploratory study
S Gao, K Jones, J Xu & J Glass
Kitchen retrofits to support food practices and wellbeing
F J Andrews, A Sal Moslehian, E Warner & R Tucker
From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps
G Goldman, D Sorokine, F Suerich-Gulick, C Carbone & M Jemtrud
Thermal comfort, ventilation and mosquito-borne disease risk in Zanzibar hospitals
O Sloan Wood, J B Knudsen, K L Schiøler, E Lupenza, M Msellem & F Saleh
Reusing precast concrete elements in construction: assessing the economic conditions
O Vigren, H Westerlind & T Malmqvist
Institutional readiness for industrialised social housing in Vietnam
T Q Nguyen, B N Nguyen, T H Q To & Z Aziz
Prefabrication for housing retrofit: governance, innovation and resident experience
E Pikas, K Kuusk, P Pihelo, R Liias, J Pukk & T Kalamees
Reframing heat pump transitions: a care perspective
J van der Haer, R Schelwald & F de Haan
Urban informal settlements in Africa: transforming adaptation governance
K Buyana & H Sseviiri
Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment
K Tähtinen, A Helin, E Parshintsev & H Hovi
Negotiating net-zero carbon: an ANT analysis of two buildings
L Schweber & M Green
Design for disassembly: a review of public policy proposals
O Vorobjev, U Uotila, T Joensuu & A Saari
Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Anticipating Chronic Climate Risks
How can local authorities better anticipate and reduce chronic climate risks in the built environment? With 20 years' experience working in local authorities tackling climate change, Joe Baker considers the challenges facing local authorities to identify and manage climate risks, and asks: How do we get the leadership, skills, capacity and meaningful action needed?
Remote Sensing for Urban Development Policies
At the 2026 Sustainable Buildings and Construction Summit Magnus Andersson, David Muthui & Reza Roodaki (Malmö University) argued that remote sensing should be a core evidence infrastructure for sustainable urban governance. Satellite derived and geospatial analysis can observe and monitor urban expansion, densification, land consumption, building form and material demand across jurisdictions and over time. A shift from two-dimensional to three-dimensional sensing and analysis provides new data to inform policies for housing, land-use efficiency, disaster exposure, public space, resource efficiency and resilient construction.