Why urban spaces need to be reimagined from an intersectional perspective, incorporating the voices and experiences of women
Cities are hubs of economic activity and cultural vibrancy, however, urban growth policies and city governance that fail to consider gender and poverty have exacerbated socio-economic disparities, exclusion, and segregation. Nourhan Bassan (GamingX) discusses some of key themes from her forthcoming book “The Gendered City”. She argues that it is imperative to understand the historical context of urban design, to critically examine gender disparities in cities, and to advocate for women's rights in shaping and accessing urban spaces.
“While women’s right to the city was largely left unattended until the recent past, it is important to understand that women have always been active participants in the building of cities. Still, many challenges remain. The progress and success of city policies depend on the capacity to ensure equal conditions and opportunities for people of all genders.” - Ana Falú (URBANET 2017)
In cities across the world, women of all ages and identities face a range of barriers and vulnerabilities: gender-based discrimination, violence, poverty, expectations of unpaid care work, limited control over assets, and unequal participation in private and public decision-making. For instance, ‘Cities Alive: Designing cities that Work for Women’ (Arup and UNDP 2022) highlights that only around 1% of women in Africa own their own land, 97% of young women in the UK have experienced sexual harassment in public, 20% of women in India are employed, 95% of women in Glasgow in Scotland, feel unsafe visiting parks at night, 29% of women in business globally are in senior decision-making positions, and 17% of the global population find it unacceptable when a female family member has a job.
The causes of inequality are many, though an underrepresentation of women in local governance institutions and urban design decisions is a major factor, along with there being inadequate accountability mechanisms for urban and municipal policies to address gender inequality. For instance, globally, women make up less than 5% of mayors and only 20% of city councilors. There are pockets of better practice, for instance, there are around double this number of women leaders in the capital cities of Tunis, Freetown, Baghdad, Paris, Bucharest, and Washington DC, though these remain exceptions.
Women perceive and experience cities differently from men and use public spaces in distinct ways. Urban design has been aligned with the work and life patterns of men, meaning our cities often make women unsafe, fail to provide for their basic needs, and restrict their social and economic opportunities. As a result, billions of women are underserved by the urban environments in which they live and work. For instance, women from impoverished and insecure neighborhoods are more likely to commute during late or early hours for educational opportunities work or such as working as vendors in open markets. These routines expose them to the risk of sexual assault. Women often experience feelings of insecurity and vulnerability when navigating public spaces, particularly at night. The lack of well-lit areas, inadequate public transportation, and the absence of safe public toilets further restrict women's freedom to move and fully participate in urban life. Women are also more likely to have inadequate access to basic services, including safe and affordable clean water, sanitation, drainage, electricity, solid waste management, as well as educational, health, reproductive, and social services (IWPR n.d.).
External factors are therefore influencing women's ability to fulfill their basic needs in cities, and the gendered division of labour within the urban economy often places women in low-paid, exploitative, and demanding work while they also maintain their households and communities. This results in a 'triple burden' for women, encompassing reproduction, production and community care. Our urban designs exacerbate this challenge.
In contemporary urban theory, cities are understood as social and historical constructs that are perceived differently by individuals. However, the consequences of historical biases in favour of designs for male needs are still evident today.
The concept of the right to the city, as proposed by Lefebvre, provides a theoretical framework for advocating urban citizenship rights and participation in decision-making processes (King 2019). It is a radical framework that calls for the transformation of urban spaces and decision making structures. This requires understanding social life and networks, unraveling the ways in which individuals practice citizenship in their everyday lives, and recognizing the agency of marginalized groups in driving urban transformation. This means that designing feminist cities involves reimagining urban spaces from an intersectional perspective, incorporating the voices and experiences of women, and considering factors such as race, class, sexuality, and disability so cities can become more inclusive and responsive to their needs. This will mean that design interventions that improve conditions for women in urban areas will be easier to achieve, such as well-lit streets, accessible public transportation, and gender-responsive infrastructure, all of which can enhance women’s safety, mobility, and overall quality of life.
Embracing a gender-responsive approach to urban planning and design ensures that the entire community can access the opportunities provided by cities and generates broader social, economic, and environmental advantages. Addressing the persistent gender disparities in urban settings is urgent, especially considering the rapid pace of global urbanization and the need for reconstruction due to conflicts and climate change. Collaboration among planners, designers, city authorities, community groups, and investors is crucial to effectively tackle these challenges and create resilient and inclusive urban environments that foster social change and yield economic benefits for all.
Gender equality in urban spaces won't happen without challenging gender stereotypes, fostering inclusive dialogue, and actively involving women in shaping urban policies. This requires addressing both the physical environment and the social and cultural norms that perpetuate gender inequities. By creating spaces that embrace diversity, promoting women's leadership, and challenging patriarchal structures, cities can become vibrant and inclusive environments that benefit everyone.
Arup and UNDP. (2022). Cities Alive: Designing cities that work for women. https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/cities-alive-designing-cities-that-work-for-women
IWPR: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (n.d.). Gender, Urbanization and Democratic Governance White Paper. National Democratic Institute. www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/Gender%20Urbanization%20and%20Local%20Governance%20White%20Paper.pdf
King, Loren. (2019). Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the City. In S.M. Meagher, S. Noll & J.S. Biehl [eds] Handbook of Philosophy of the City. Routledge. pp.76-86. 10.4324/9781315681597-7
URBANET. (2017). Women’s Right to the City: Reflections on Inclusive Urban Planning. https://www.urbanet.info/womens-right-to-the-city/
Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby
Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities
As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.
Unmaking Cities Can Catalyse Sustainable Transformations
Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.