Faye Wade (University of Edinburgh) highlights the importance of building retrofit for a
sustainable economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only does retrofitting
promise a major step toward a low carbon society, it also contributes to
increased GDP and jobs in the construction sector.
Action to manage the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic has resulted in loss of jobs and slowing of economic growth worldwide. A number of high profile organizations have now identified low carbon building retrofitting as a fundamental pillar for a green economic recovery (LGA, 2020; RICS, 2020; EC, 2020b; CCC, 2020; WWF, 2020). This article explains why buildings need to be retrofitted and the economic and employment potential of doing so, before exploring skills gaps and training prioritization.
The European Union’s (EU) building stock is the largest single energy
consumer in Europe, contributing to 40% of energy consumption and 30% of greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions (EC, 2020a). Reducing this is essential for meeting the
aims of the Paris Agreement and international climate targets. However, 80% of
today’s buildings will still be in use in 2050 and 75% of this stock is energy
inefficient (EC, 2020a). Energy retrofitting, or the improvement of fabric,
controls, service and lighting as well as the provision of low carbon heat and
hot water, is essential for reducing energy demand and associated GHG
emissions. Rates of retrofitting are currently low, with the EU’s 1% annual
rate of reduction of the (domestic and non-domestic) building stock’s primary
energy consumption sitting way below what is needed (EC, 2019). In
the UK, the Government’s Clean Growth
Strategy has set targets for as
many homes as possible to have an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) C rating
by 2035 (UK Government, 2017a). With 70% of the UK housing stock currently
falling below EPC C, this leaves 19 million homes to retrofit within 15 years
(Rosenow et al., 2018). Reducing energy demand and achieving targets will thus
require unprecedented speed and scale of efforts to retrofit the entire building
stock.
There are promising activities in some places. For example, the European Green Deal will support a ‘Renovation Wave’ of buildings, which aims to at least double the annual renovation rate of existing building stock (EC, 2020b). This initiative will seek to establish a Communication and Action Plan (EC, 2020a) that includes:
The Scottish Government’s Energy Efficient Scotland programme takes a
similarly broad approach, incorporating a clear legislative framework alongside
the development of supply chains, consumer awareness and financing. The
programme, which aims for all homes to be at least EPC C by 2040 where
technically feasible and cost effective, has been piloted for the past 3 years
and is set to roll out across Scotland over the next 20 (Scottish Government,
2018).
The built environment and
residential properties in particular are the largest value infrastructure in
most countries; these buildings also usually have very high longevity. Economic
benefits of retrofitting could include the potential to extend the service life
of a building, and increase the real estate value. For example, retrofitting
Canadian office buildings can result in a decrease in operating costs, increase
in occupancy rates and an increase in rental revenue (Carlson & Pressnail,
2018). In addition, buildings that consume less energy could contribute to a
shifting and reduction of peak demand, alleviating pressures on the grid and
facilitating the use of renewable energy supply technologies.
Poor quality domestic buildings contribute to
higher-than-necessary energy demand and high levels of GHG emissions. In the
UK, there is a disproportionately large number of energy poor households in low
quality properties in EPC bands E, F and G (BEIS, 2018: 35), and those who are energy poor are
statistically more likely to report poor health and emotional well-being
(Thomson, Snell & Bouzarovski, 2017). If considering the indirect impacts
of ill-health – for example, absenteeism and reduced productivity – the
economic impacts of poor quality buildings are even higher. Indeed, energy efficient
office buildings have the potential to increase worker productivity by
approximately 12% (BPIE, 2020).
Improving
the building stock can reduce pressures on health services, increase well-being
and economic output, and lead to higher levels of disposable income and
associated spending. Thus, retrofitting programmes have the ability to boost
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For example, modelling estimates suggest a
boost of £7.8 billion to the Scottish economy alone through the Energy
Efficient Scotland programme (Turner et al., 2018).
Further, construction and building retrofit is a labour-intensive activity. It has been estimated that for every €1 million invested in energy renovation of buildings, an average of 18 jobs are created in the EU (BPIE, 2020). This is roughly equivalent to the number of new jobs created per £1 million of UK Government grant funding invested in new innovation sectors such as biotechnology, medical equipment engineering, high-tech manufacturing. For example, £8 billion of UK Government investment in innovation research & development generated approximately 150,000 new jobs over 13 years (UK Government, 2017b).
Meeting the EU’s existing 2030 climate and energy targets can add 1% of GDP and create almost 1 million new green jobs (EC, 2020b). The significance of retrofitting is indicated by future low carbon jobs projections for England. Here, it is estimated that roughly 160,000 jobs will be in low carbon heat, whilst another 145,000 will be in energy efficiency products, including insulation, lighting and control systems (LGA, 2020).
Figure 1. Split of low carbon and renewable energy economy jobs in England by 2030 (Source: LGA, 2020: 7)
With these multiple benefits, scaling up rates of retrofitting will be crucial for achieving climate goals, and supporting the COVID-19 recovery effort.
The workforce needed for successful, wide-scale energy retrofitting is diverse. Work towards developing retrofitting standards across the UK includes Each Home Counts (Bonfield, 2016) and the associated PAS 2035 qualification, and the development of a Scottish Quality Mark (Cuthbert, 2019). The retrofitting process outlined in both cases includes assessment, installation, inspection and consumer protection. The variety of roles to be filled thus includes:
New roles are emerging to deliver retrofit, and there is an additional
need to plug growing skills gaps in construction. In the UK, the number of
first year Further Education trainees fell from roughly 13,750 to 4,500 in the
wood trades, and 9,000 to 2,350 in bricklaying between 2007 and 2015
(ConstructionSkills, 2015). Additional regional skills gaps have been
identified. For example, shortages of bricklayers, joiners and painter &
decorators have been identified in Scotland (Scottish Government, 2019). A key
near-term (2020-2025) skills gap is in the design, specification and
installation of heat pumps (LGA, 2019). In addition, there are likely to be
local differences in need for and distribution of jobs. For example, regions
off the gas grid will need a workforce in the near-term qualified to fit
individual low carbon technologies such as heat pumps.
Filling these gaps, and delivering new skills for retrofitting will require a rapid shift in the UK’s provision of existing vocational qualifications. The complex processes involved in energy retrofitting require ‘energy literacy’ across all construction roles (Clarke, Gleeson & Winch, 2017), and the related occupations listed above. In particular, design and construction teams need to be aware of the implications of their decisions on others’ work (Owen, Janda & Simpson, 2019). Now is the time to develop new structures for the provision of training. This must include general knowledge of low energy construction and skills in understanding the ‘whole house’ needs, alongside tailoring to specific skills for the trade or role. In addition, COVID-19 has left many sectors (e.g. travel and hospitality) with increased levels of unemployment. It would be fruitful to explore how the transferable skills of these workers can be utilized in retrofitting. For example, experts in consumer protection from these sectors could potentially combine their existing knowledge with new training on buildings and energy to work within retrofitting.
With their benefits for the environment, economy, and employment, large
scale building retrofit programmes are exactly what is needed to recover from
the impacts of COVID-19 as well as transition the economy over the longer term.
A strategic approach to creating a qualified workforce for high quality
building retrofit would offer clear economic and environmental benefits in the
longer term. Such an approach is being pursued by the European Commission
through their Renovation Wave, and Scottish Government who are continuing
development of the Energy Efficient Scotland programme.
The benefits outlined here, coupled with vociferous campaigning for retrofit from numerous organisations, emphasize the need for multifaceted support for such schemes. Government roles include:
The importance and delivery of such wide-scale energy retrofitting will be explored in a forthcoming special issue of Buildings & Cities: Retrofitting at Scale: Accelerating Capabilities for Domestic Building Stocks. The special issue will focus on the accelerated delivery of domestic energy retrofitting at different scales: national, municipal, neighbourhood and individual sites. It will draw out distinctions and complementarities for policies and delivery strategies for different scales, stakeholders, inhabitants and disciplines
BEIS (2018). Annual fuel poverty statistics report 2018 (2016 data).
England. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-fuel-poverty-statistics-report-2018
Bonfield, P. (2016). Each Home Counts: an
independent review of consumer advice, protection, standards and enforcement
for energy efficiency and renewable energy. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/578749/Each_Home_Counts__December_2016_.pdf
BPIE (2020). Building Renovation: A kick-starter for the EU recovery.
Report prepared as part of the Renovate Europe Campaign. Available at: https://www.renovate-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/BPIE-Research-Layout_FINALPDF_08.06.pdf
Carlson, K. & Pressnail, K. (2018).
Value impacts of energy efficiency retrofits on commercial office buildings in
Toronto, Canada. Energy and Buildings,
162: 154-162.
CCC (2020). Letter: Building a resilient
recovery from the COVID-19 crisis to Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Committee on
Climate Change. Available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/letter-building-a-resilient-recovery-from-the-covid-19-crisis-to-prime-minister-boris-johnson/
Clarke, L., Gleeson, C., & Winch, C. (2017). What kind of expertise
is needed for low energy construction? Construction Management and Economics,
35(3): 78-89.
ConstructionSkills (2015). Training and the
built environment 2014. Bircham Newton: CITB.
Cuthbert, I. (2019). Quality Assurance Short
Life Working Group Recommendations Report.
BEIS (2018). Annual fuel poverty statistics report 2018 (2016 data). England. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
EC. (2019). Comprehensive study of building energy renovation activities and the uptake of nearly zero-energy buildings in the EU. Prepared by Ipsos Belgium and Navigant for European Commission.
EC. (2020a). A Renovation Wave initiative
for public and private buildings. Roadmap. European Commission.
EC. (2020b). Europe’s Moment: Repair and
Prepare for the Next Generation. Communication from the Commission to the
European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, The European Economic
and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0456&from=EN
LGA. (2020). Local green jobs –
accelerating a sustainable economic recovery. An Ecuity Consulting report for
the Local Government Association.
Owen, A., Janda, K. B., & Simpson, K. (2020). Who are the “middle actors”
in sustainable construction and what do they need to know? In Scott, L.,
Dastbaz, M. & Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design [conference
proceedings], 191–204. Cham: Springer.
RICS. (2020). Retrofitting to decarbonise
UK existing housing stock: RICS net zero policy position paper. Royal Institute
of Chartered Surveyors. Available at: https://www.rics.org/globalassets/rics-website/media/news/news--opinion/retrofitting-to-decarbonise-the-uk-existing-housing-stock-v2.pdf
Rosenow, J., Guertler, P., Sorrell, S., & Eyre, N.C. (2018). The remaining potential for energy savings in UK households. Energy Policy, 121: 542–552.
Scottish Government (2018). Energy Efficient Scotland
Routemap. Available at: https://www.gov.scot/publications/energy-efficient-scotland-route-map/
Scottish Government (2019). New housing and future
construction skills: adapting and modernizing for growth.
Thomson, H., Snell, C., & Bouzarovski, S. (2017). Health, well-being and energy poverty in Europe: A comparative study of 32 European countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(6): 584–20.
Turner K., Katris A., Figus
G., Low R. (2018). Potential wider economic impacts of the Energy Efficient
Scotland programme. Policy Brief. Centre for Energy Policy, University of
Strathclyde.
UK Government (2017a). Clean Growth Strategy. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-growth-strategy
UK Government (2017b) New jobs and billions to UK economy from innovation grants. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-jobs-and-billions-to-uk-economy-from-innovation-grant
UK Government (2020). ‘Build, build, build’: Prime Minister announces New Deal for Britain. Press Release. 30 June 2020. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/build-build-build-prime-minister-announces-new-deal-for-britain
WWF (2020). A UK investment strategy: building back a resilient and sustainable economy. A Vivid Economics report for the WWF. Available at: https://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/4762-AUKInvestmentStrategy_Type_ONLINE.pdf
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
5th Anniversary Essays
These commissioned essays from Buildings & Cities' authors and readers explore how the research landscape is changing. New essays are continuously being added to the collection during 2024 as part of B&C's anniversary.
Collectively, these essays offer fresh insights into the processes and issues that are currently inadequate or missing in the built environment research landscape. A wide perspective from different disciplines and geographies creates a positive, collective vision for shaping the research agenda. Recommendations are made for what needs to change.
We hope this will provoke and inspire research funders, researchers and other stakeholders to discuss, reflect and act. Ideas range from systemic change to key research questions to improving engagement to change of focus.
The Challenges of Evidence-Based Design
While some progress has been made, particularly in areas like healing architecture where the impact of design on human well-being is more directly observable, much work remains to be done to extend evidence-based design to broader fields of architecture, urban planning and design. Meta Berghauser Pont (Chalmers University of Technology) explains the challenges and pathways needed for a shift toward evidence-based design in urban planning and urban design.