New digital tools created for building stocks and cities

This 3D ‘digital twin’ for London can be used for the monitoring, simulation and analysis of the building stock - for improving energy efficiency, reducing fuel poverty and targetting retrofit strategies.

This is a world first for digital twins - an interactive model containing rich data on a city's buildings and their energy use. The Greater London Authority (GLA) have launched two new digital tools to support efforts towards making the capital’s building stock carbon neutral by 2050. These are the London Building Stock Model and the London Solar Opportunity Map. The Model shows how cities can harness and effectively combine data to enhance their policy and deliver appropriate strategies.

The London Building Stock Model contains detailed data on every separate domestic and non-domestic building in the 33 Boroughs of Greater London. These add up to some 1.5 million houses, 1.9 million flats, and around 250,000 non-domestic premises. The Model includes three-dimensional information about buildings including their heights, volumes and wall areas, as well as the nature of the activities of the occupants on each floor. Other data are attached on the ages of buildings, their materials of construction, and (in some cases) their servicing systems. Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and Display Energy Certificates are attached to dwellings and premises, and those which lack Certificates are assigned ‘virtual EPCs’ estimated statistically in each case from a building’s characteristics and location. The Model provides a snapshot for 2017 and will be updated annually.  The background to the Model's development was decribed in a recent article in Buildings & Cities: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.52 .

The Model is being used by the GLA and London Boroughs to tackle fuel poverty and improve the energy efficiency of the capital’s building stock. It allows poorly performing dwellings and non-domestic buildings to be identified. It supports Boroughs in their enforcement of the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard. Programmes of retrofits to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050 or earlier can be planned and evaluated.

The Model has been supplied in two versions, both in 2D map form, accessed via web interfaces. The first, for the GLA and Boroughs, has a powerful analytical tool with which graphs, charts and tabular outputs can be produced. The second version is public and is intended for use by householders, property owners, businesses and community groups to make energy improvements to their premises and reduce their energy bills. It can be accessed at

https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/energy/energy-buildings/london-building-stock-model

The London Solar Opportunity Map shows the energy potentially available, either electricity from photovoltaic (PV) installations or heat from thermal collectors, on all roofs and areas of open land for the whole of the capital out to the M25 motorway. It is based on a 3D model of terrain, buildings, other structures and trees derived from LiDAR – laser measurements made from overflying aircraft. The Map will help London to achieve the Mayor’s targets of 1 gigawatt of installed solar power by 2030, and 2 gigawatts by 2050.

Calculations are made of the amounts of direct and diffuse solar radiation falling annually on all surfaces, taking account of overshadowing by neighbouring buildings and trees. From these figures, the solar energy potential is estimated, allowing for the slopes of roofs and for different solar technologies. A minimum threshold is set, below which installations are likely to be uneconomic. The character of land surfaces and their suitability for solar are represented in the Map: some areas such as roads, woodlands and Royal Parks are excluded. The Map is linked to the London Building Stock Model, which makes it possible to know the uses and potential reductions in other energy use if solar panels were installed.

Besides policy making by the GLA, it is intended for householders, building owners, solar installers, and investors in solar power. Data are included in the Map on some 100 megawatts of existing solar installations. Early analysis of the Map shows that around a quarter of the Mayor’s 2-Gigawatt target could be met with PV on the roofs of 4000 large warehouses. Alternatively, the entire 2Gw could be achieved with installations on a third of a million houses, the majority of them built before 1939.

The Map is made available through a web interface at https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/energy/energy-buildings/london-solar-opportunity-map

Both the Model and the Map are very data-intensive, and respond faster with the Chrome or Firefox browsers, and via a cable rather than wireless internet connection.

The tools have been developed by the Energy Institute and the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis at University College London. The members of the teams responsible for the tools are Stephen Evans, Rob Liddiard, Daniel Godoy-Shimizu, Dominic Humphrey, Ivan Korolija, Gareth Simons, Paul Ruyssevelt and Philip Steadman.

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila

Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby

Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni

Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi

Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen

Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam

Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen

Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula

A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers

Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling

Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert

Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane

Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen

Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian

US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong

Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han

Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel

Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben

New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn

‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad

Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke

The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson

Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty

Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs

Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel

Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner

Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould

Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey

Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar

How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang

Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow

Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson

Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka

Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves

See all

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.

Join Our Community