Impacts of Energy Policy on Urban GHG Emissions

Impacts of Energy Policy on Urban GHG Emissions

Which combination of policy measures are most appropriate for reducing urban emissions? New peer-reviewed research shows how economic, technology and urban building energy models can be combined and used to evaluate policy efficacy.

Until now, uncertainties of economic and market-driven factors in urban building energy models (UBEM) have been a challenge for building energy modellers. The spatial impact of energy and emissions policies in urban environments is often hard to determine. UBEMs often fail to recognise the financial and social influences over new buildings and/ or retrofitting existing building stocks. In INTEGRATION OF AN ENERGY-ECONOMY MODEL WITH AN URBAN ENERGY MODEL, Lu et al. present a new approach for integrating these different types of model. Specifically, the authors integrate outputs from a spatial economic model with a spatially explicit community-level UBEM. This is a major contribution in the development of an integrated modelling approach, but also in quantifying the co-benefits of multi-scale effects of energy and emission reduction policies.

Lu et al. adopt a ‘sandbox’ approach to simulate urban form and building retrofit policies, working at a neighbourhood scale. The sandbox represents a particular urban form, including population density, street pattern, block size and land-use proportions, all derived from a real neighbourhood. This allows for an increasingly realistic representation of the integrated processes that influence energy-usage and emissions output, including fuel choice, building design, mechanical systems, urban form and behaviour.

With this combination, the researchers have been able to model the evolution of a neighbourhood’s individual buildings (HVAC system and the building shell) over time. This provides a much higher level of granularity than many existing efforts to understand how building stock changes over time in response to different policy strategies. The interaction between building technology policies and different urban growth-management strategies can be better understood and harnessed. Policy makers are afforded extremely valuable and detailed insights into the impact of energy policies at an individual building-level, prior to their implementation. Insights arising from this combined model will assist practitioners involved in both city planning and energy management.

A case study applies the model to the Sunset region of Vancouver, Canada. The case study explored three urban-form policy experiments: dispersed, commercial corridor, and transportation-oriented development (TOD). The analysis illustrates the combined results of a technology policy regulating a shift towards electrification and a spatial urban form densification policy. The authors identify specific growth-management strategies that can be more effective for reducing emissions than when integrated with other urban form strategies.

Policies focused on energy and emissions standards for new buildings will be relatively more effective in areas with a growth-management strategy that necessitates the redevelopment of many existing buildings. This demonstrates a useful approach for understanding exactly which policy instruments, such as densification, higher building energy standards, and fuel switching, will bring the most emissions reductions.

Funding

The research was funded by Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS).  Additional funding from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Canada and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) supported tool development and related research.

Reference

Lu, Y., Scott, A., Kim, J. C., Curi, C. B., McCarty, J., Pardy, A., Rysanek, A., Girling, C & Kellett, R. (2021). Integration of an energy–economy model with an urban energy model. Buildings and Cities, 2(1), 114–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.71

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila

Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby

Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni

Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi

Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen

Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam

Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen

Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula

A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers

Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling

Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert

Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane

Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen

Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian

US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong

Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han

Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel

Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben

New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn

‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad

Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke

The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson

Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty

Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs

Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel

Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner

Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould

Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey

Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar

How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang

Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow

Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson

Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka

Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves

See all

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.

Join Our Community