Following Hal

Hal Wilhite
Hal Wilhite

Elizabeth Shove reflects on the recent passing of Hal Wilhite, Emeritus Professor at the University of Oslo. Hal was also a member of the Editorial Board at Building Research & Information

It is with some disbelief and huge sadness that I find myself writing this note. Hal Wilhite, who died in August 2019, had a key role in bringing social science and energy together and in making what has become a thriving field.

For a decade or so, starting in the mid 1990s, Hal and I were part of a close knit academic ‘gang’. Together with Loren Lutzenhiser and Willett Kempton, we took all the opportunities we could to meet, to work together and to establish the foundations of an agenda that has now really taken root. Many others have been involved, before and since, and there have been overlapping and ongoing collaborations, but for us four that was a critical period.

In my view one of Hal’s earliest publications ‘A cross cultural analysis of household energy use behavior in Japan and Norway’ (1996a) remains one of his best. At the time it was exceptionally rare for an anthropologist to get stuck into debates about energy policy but that is exactly what Hal did. His comparative study of bathing and lighting in Japan and Norway has become a classic and for good reason. It is much more than a description of different cultures: read carefully, it raises really challenging questions about how the ‘need’ for energy develops and changes. It is also deceptively simple. This is typical. Hal had a winning way of persuading new audiences of the relevance of social research and of gently introducing them to the basics of method and approach.

This went along with a more critical edge. A chapter entitled ‘The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand’ (Wilhite et. al 2000) provides a telling reminder of the effort involved in crafting a meaningful place for anthropology and sociology in debates dominated by other disciplines. Hal has since applied these approaches to contrast challenges of sustainable development in the Global North and South (McNeill & Wilhite, 2015), and consider how wellbeing factors into sustainable consumption (Guillen-Royo & Wilhite, 2014). He also advocated for sustainability policy to aim for reduction – not just greater efficiency – in the energy needed for services such as light, heat and hot water (Wilhite, 2017).

Hal’s irrepressible commitment to this cause has inspired generations of social researchers to take the topic of energy, and of energy in buildings seriously. Amongst much else, Hal’s work showed that seemingly small questions about the use of refrigerators in India (Wilhite, 2008) or the development of air-conditioning in Japan (Wilhite, Nakagami & Murakoshi, 1996b) were crucial for understanding the history and the dynamics of energy demand. These contributions are likely to have a lasting effect. For those of us who knew Hal personally, there will be other enduring memories. Although Hal spent much of his working life in Oslo, he came from Texas. Since I am from England, his idea that cheese might come in bunches still makes me laugh.


References

Guillen-Royo, M. and Wilhite, H. (2014). Wellbeing and Sustainable Consumption. In: Glatzer, W., Canfield, L, Møller, V, Rojas, M. (eds) Global Handbook of Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality of life. Dordrecht: Springer: 301-316

McNeill, D. and Wilhite, H. (2015) Making sense of sustainable development in a changing world, in Hansen, A. and Wethal, U. (Eds.) Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability: Theories, Strategies, Local Realities, London: Routledge: 34-49.

Wilhite, H. (2008). Consumption and the transformation of everyday life: A view from South India. Palsgrave Macmillan. Hampshire, UK and New York, USA.

Wilhite, H. (2017). Politics and sustainability. In Egenhoefer, R. (Ed.) Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Design. Oxon, UK and New York, USA: Routledge: 115-124.

Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H., Masada, T., Yamaga. Y. and Haneda, H. (1996a). "A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway." Energy Policy 24(9): 795-803.

Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H. and Murakoshi, C. (1996b). The dynamics of changing Japanese energy consumption patterns and their implications for sustainable consumption. Proceedings from the ACEEE 1996 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington D.C.

Wilhite, H. Shove, E, Lutzenhiser, L. and Kempton, W. (2000) ‘The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about individual behaviour but next to nothing about demand’ in Jochem, E. Sathaye, J. and Bouille, D. (eds), Society, Behaviour, and Climate Change Mitigation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 109-123.


Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila

Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby

Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni

Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi

Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen

Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam

Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen

Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula

A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers

Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling

Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert

Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane

Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen

Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian

US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong

Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han

Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel

Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben

New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn

‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad

Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke

The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson

Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty

Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs

Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel

Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner

Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould

Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey

Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar

How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang

Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow

Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson

Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka

Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves

See all

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.

Join Our Community