
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/news/welcome.html
It is our pleasure to welcome you to the Buildings and Cities journal. We are created by and for the research community that we serve. Our emphasis is on creating, supporting and maintaining a vibrant global and inclusive community of authors and readers.
Our content is diverse and cross-disciplinary. Buildings and Cities considers the interplay and interactions between the different scales of region, city, building stocks, neighbourhood, street or block, and the individual site / building. We also address fragmentation - of disciplinary boundaries and responsibilities, regulation and governance, research and practice.
Understanding how these elements interact is critical for meeting the current challenges we face in policy and practice. We will bring additional content to you - briefing papers, synthesis articles, policy analysis, replication articles, methods articles, commentaries, book reviews.
We're innovative. We will actively encourage engagement with the end users of research - policy makers, practitioners, clients and wider society. We recognise that the dialogue must be two-way to be meaningful. In addition to content on our website, we will partner with organisations to host events to discuss research needs, research findings and the actions that need to arise.
We're launching this journal to respond to the multiple crises and challenges facing the built environment. First and foremost are the challenges in our towns, cities and peri-urban areas to create a built environment that supports human development and ecological systems and reduces resource demand and GHG emissions. Places that are safe, healthy, inclusive, sustainable and adaptable over time. A built environment that mitigates climate change and makes a positive contribution to global and local vitality. The professional responsibilities owed to society are shifting; consequently education, training, skills and organisational practices need to respond.
The editors have a proven reputation for providing a rigorous, high-quality peer-review process for journal articles and curated themed issues. Our previous success at Building Research & Information shows what we can deliver with confidence. We use a double-blind peer review system with a minimum of 3 expert reviewers. Our editors advise and assist authors with the feedback they receive.
We recognise the enormous contribution that authors, reviewers and editors contribute to this journal - so we don't exploit authors' and reviewers' work by extracting a profit. Any surplus will go into the journal or back into the research community as small grants or financial assistance for publishing. We're independent from large publishers who impose strictures on their journals and editors. As a not-for-profit organisation, we are not motivated to publish more and more to benefit shareholders (we have no shareholders).
You are invited to participate in this active community and contribute your research and insights. We will encourage a two-way dialogue and exchange with practitioners, clients, policy makers and the public.

Richard Lorch,
Editor in Chief
Timing matters: life cycle embodied GHG emissions of circular building strategies
A Wöhler, L Rosado, H Abu Ghaida, H Wallbaum & A Hollberg
Scaling up retrofit: regional challenges and opportunities for MMC
H Dörr, P Späth & I Goñi
Design as communicative activity: implications for sustainability assessment software
T Säwén, A Sasic Kalagasidis & A Hollberg
Indoor temperature and office work performance in a temperate climate
T Kramer & S Schiavon
Moving homes and energy poverty: residents’ concerns, capabilities and responses
M Jalas, J Rinkinen, S Numminen & E Valkealahti
Reference study for biogenic carbon storage in the residential building stock
O Iliescu, I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Building space heating and cooling in NDCs 4.0
T P Lützkendorf
Building component reuse as sociomaterial interaction: lessons from precast concrete
J Uusikartano, L Alkki & V Capitani
Validating national reuse indicators from regional demolition data: a Swedish example
F Ericsson, K Mjörnell & U Janson
Climate change risk and decision-making [editorial]
S Foxell & I Cooper
Technologies of reconstruction [editorial]
P Tombesi
Urban form metrics for building occupancy modelling: applications and impacts
D Reiter, M Jehling & R Hecht
Retrofit realism: affordable low-carbon policies for existing homes
N Eyre & R Khosla

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Two Key Messages for COP31
Space Heating & Cooling in NDCs 4.0: Nationally Determined Constributions (NDCs) are at the heart of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. NDCs embody each country's efforts to reduce their emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. So it is essential to include the building stock (particularly space heating and cooling) in the next NDCs.
Realistic Retrofit: Residential buildings are major users of energy and emitters of CO2. What constitutes realistic retrofit? Affordable, practical low-carbon policies for homes are described for both the Global North and Global South.
Thomas Lützkendorf and Nick Eyre send their messages to COP31: prioritise the building stock in NDCs and implement policies for practical retrofit. Watch their videos - for links to the videos click on "More" below:
Practitioners’ Views of POE
Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is widely valued but weakly embedded in practice. Ant Marsh, Kate van Someren, Lara Clarke and Tom Randall (Arup Building Performance and Commissioning Services) explain the findings from a survey and focus groups with UK construction industry practitioners. They identified fragmented responsibility, split commercial incentives and a persistent fear of “bad news”. Making POE routine requires a shift from producing reports to a focus on improving outcomes by owning and acting on learning.