Watch the presentations and respondents on "Zero Carbon: Can Built Environment Education Deliver?" outlining how built environment education and training needs to urgently change.
Two launch events in the US and UK of the latest B&C special issue Education and Training: Mainstreaming Zero Carbon considered the options for a rapid transition within universities
and training colleges to equip students with new
knowledge and skills to create a zero-carbon built environment.
We are at a critical transition in the built environment education – specifically how built environment programs, practitioners, and the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry are addressing zero carbon agenda and what more needs to be urgently done. Solutions involve the coordination of rapid and innovative responses to a wide range of issues: educational and training pedagogies, curricular change, governance and policy leadership, changes to the roles of teachers and certification bodies. The peer reviewed articles make clear that a variety of integrated actions are needed: policy interventions for structural reform, improved validation requirements, more streamlined pedagogical practices, broader ethical considerations, interdisciplinary and collective working practices, upskilling carbon literacy and abilities by organisations and professionals across the built environment industry.
The peer reviewed articles make clear that a variety of integrated actions are needed: policy interventions for structural reform, improved validation requirements, more streamlined pedagogical practices, broader ethical considerations, interdisciplinary and collective working practices, upskilling carbon literacy and abilities by organisations and professionals across the built environment industry.
To promote a wider international dialogue, two virtual events considered what constitutes a rapid change agenda and roadmap for built environment education. One event was hosted by a leading UK building industry think tank, The EDGE on 1 February 2021 (chaired by Bill Gething, University of the West of England) and the other was hosted on 8 February 2021 by the Carbon Leadership Forum, a leading edge organisation for change in the US, (chaired by Anthony Hickling, Carbon Leadership Forum).
Short presentations were made by 4 (of the 10) special issue authors :
Fionn Stevenson (Univ of Sheffield) & Alison Kwok (Univ of Oregon): “Introduction & key findings”
Gavin Killip (Univ of Oxford): “A reform agenda for construction education and practice”
Kathryn Janda (University College London): “Preparing ‘middle actors’ to deliver zero-carbon building transitions”
Malini Srivastava (Univ of Minnnesota): “Cooperative learning in design studios: a pedagogy for net-positive performance”
This is followed by four key respondents from industry who briefly consider how education and training needs to change and their role(s) in a roadmap for change and embracing the following questions:
David Gloster, Director of Education, Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA)
Lynne Jack, Heriot Watt University & Past President, Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE)
Marsha Maytum, Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects, Educator, 2019 American Institute of Architects (AIA) COTE Chair
Steph Carlisle, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Pennsylvania
These presentations were followed in each event by a lively Q&A session. There was broad agreement in each case that urgent action and coordination are needed at many levels: within and between professional institutions, by course accreditation bodies and within universities and departments to upskill educators and integrate the curriculum. It was also acknowledged that there are different ways of doing this which should involve a more interdisciplinary approach, one that is open to effective improvisation, and with an ability to reach out beyond traditional industry and disciplinary silos.
The videos showcased here capture the various speakers’ presentations, but not the audience dialogue.
Latest Commentaries
Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities
As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.
Unmaking Cities Can Catalyse Sustainable Transformations
Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.