By Sandy Halliday. Routledge, 2019, ISBN: 9781138200289
Building scientist, troubleshooter and policy advisor Bill Bordass reviews the second edition of this book. It is substantially rewritten and even better than the first edition, which was itself derived from a series of teaching modules.
This is a very good book, intelligent in
outlook, broad in scope, well-structured, well-illustrated and inspirational.
Perhaps uniquely, it is also highly readable and will appeal to a wide
audience: from experts and professionals to students and non-specialists -
perhaps someone wondering what to do to improve the sustainability of their
house or workplace, or a policymaker seeking to be better-informed on a subject
that is at last appearing in mainstream debate. This is a remarkable
achievement. Although there are many other books on sustainable built
environment, this one provides a consistent, wide-ranging and insightful
approach.
This new edition has more pages, fewer
sections and more illustrations. 120 short case studies (of buildings,
procedures, studies, results etc.) from around the world are interspersed with
the text, enlivening the presentation and triggering the imagination. I only
wish the publishers had changed the title: it is about so much more than
construction and should be found at the front of the bookshop, not to special
order, or in a remote technical backwater.
Of its twelve Sections, the first four are on background issues: Drivers (a history of ideas on the subject over the past half-century, illustrated by iconic early projects), Policy and Legislation (including some local policies that can be thought-provoking, e.g. why isn’t everybody doing this?), Cost Issues (not a dreary succession of tables but a thoughtful discussion of cost, investment, value in the broadest sense, and doing more with less), and Appraisal Methods. The next six cover technical aspects: Materials Selection, Low-impact Construction, Internal Environmental Control (with fabric coming first of course), Energy Generation, Lighting and Daylighting, and Water and Sewage Management. Then comes Construction Processes (which stresses the importance of briefing, consultation, questioning assumptions, and continuity in maintaining initial aspirations), and a concluding section on Urban Ecology, reaching outside buildings themselves.
The book has the great advantage of being
written by a single person with great knowledge, long experience, clear
insights and a sense of purpose: not inconsistently cobbled together from
different chapter authors, as too often happens with books of such a wide scope.
It is not just a technical manual: the author hopes it will help move
sustainable construction to the heart and soul of economic and social policy
and contribute to health, well-being and life chances.
As an assessor of building performance in
use, this reviewer would like to have seen a few longer case studies – but perhaps
these are better left to others on the web, as the information can date quite
rapidly. Some case studies could also have been more critical, particularly for
projects for which good in-use performance histories are available. Getting any
building to work in accordance with its design intent is difficult: most never
do, owing to the lack of a chain of custody that connects from client and
design intent to operational reality. The need for this “golden thread” was also
pointed out in the recent report (Hackitt,
2019) into the horrific fire at Grenfell Tower in London – where ill-considered
alterations to improve thermal performance appear to have been a major
contributor. As at Grenfell, many building projects lack sufficient attention
to detail; and seldom receive much aftercare and fine tuning in the months or
even years after handover. The results also include the now-notorious
“performance gaps” between energy performance claims and actual outcomes. Other
aspects can also fall short, including occupant satisfaction, health and
comfort.
An example of one kind of discrepancy is
what happened with Oberlin College’s Adam Joseph Lewis Centre (completed
in 2001). Its spacesused about three times the predicted amount of energy, far exceeding
the annual supply from the 60 kWp rooftop photovoltaic panels that were
intended to make it a nett energy exporter. This dramatically increased its primary
energy and carbon footprint, as the low-energy expectations had meant it was all-electric.
Five years later, with 101 kWp of photovoltaic panels added over the car park,
its annual electricity use still exceeded the PV supply. This situation was only
remedied in 2012 – eleven years after completion – when the College appointed a
building manager who initially worked full-time on solving the building’s performance
problems (Janda
& Topouzi, 2015). During the whole time, its performance was
scrutinised by Oberlin’s academics – who initially disagreed radically about
assessment methods, which greatly affected any conclusions about its sustainability.
This all provided a valuable learning experience.
Insights such as this would have added further
depth to the arguments in the book. Buildings with sustainable design intent
and a skilled team can be intrinsically more robust than ordinary ones: more
future-proof and less dependent on consumables, technology, management and
maintenance. However, the job of creating a well-integrated and well-performing
building is exacting, as there tend to be more interdependencies between people,
skills, elements, systems, technologies and management; and routine tune-ups
after completion seldom happen. I liken it to a staircase: if not all the steps
are in place, you won’t end up where you want to be.
Modern procurement systems often don’t help
either, salami-slicing the “golden thread” from client and design intent to
practical reality: the author likens this to a relay race in which the baton is
not passed over. We need radical change in client, industry and government practices;
true professionals across design and building teams who take full account of
“the other” in their work and follow their projects through after handover; and
an industry that pays attention to detail and is driven by achieving good
performance in reality, not just in theory.
A good read end-to-end, this book has a clear structure and a good index, and can be dipped into at any point. Recently, I was pleased to see an already well-thumbed copy in the studio of one of those few architecture schools that make sustainability central to their curriculum. Other departments – not just architectural - now have no excuse not to follow suit: this important book should become a standard text for all built environment students and practitioners. If it also receives the broader attention it deserves, it will have achieved the author’s ambition to put a thoughtful approach to sustainable buildings and environments into mainstream economic and social thinking. For anybody not yet convinced, an informative four-minute introductory video by the author is here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMJtLb4nDUU .
Hackitt, J. (May 2019) Building a safer future, Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report, London: HMSO, chapter 8. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-building-regulations-and-fire-safety-final-report
Janda, K. & Topouzi, M. (2015) Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy, Building Research & Information, 43:4, 516-533, page 521 et seq. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09613218.2015.1020217
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
5th Anniversary Essays
These commissioned essays from Buildings & Cities' authors and readers explore how the research landscape is changing. New essays are continuously being added to the collection during 2024 as part of B&C's anniversary.
Collectively, these essays offer fresh insights into the processes and issues that are currently inadequate or missing in the built environment research landscape. A wide perspective from different disciplines and geographies creates a positive, collective vision for shaping the research agenda. Recommendations are made for what needs to change.
We hope this will provoke and inspire research funders, researchers and other stakeholders to discuss, reflect and act. Ideas range from systemic change to key research questions to improving engagement to change of focus.
The Challenges of Evidence-Based Design
While some progress has been made, particularly in areas like healing architecture where the impact of design on human well-being is more directly observable, much work remains to be done to extend evidence-based design to broader fields of architecture, urban planning and design. Meta Berghauser Pont (Chalmers University of Technology) explains the challenges and pathways needed for a shift toward evidence-based design in urban planning and urban design.