By Frank W. Geels and Bruno Turnheim. Cambridge University Press, 2022, ISBN: 9781009198240
William Throndsen applauds this book which advocates for socio-technical approaches to reconfigure low-carbon transitions of the electricity, heat and mobility energy sectors. The substantial overview and extensive examples provided make the book a relevant policy makers.
In the preface of The Great Reconfiguration, the authors mention that a growing sense of urgency acted as backdrop for the writing of this book as the Sixth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2021) was presented at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow. Now, nearly a year and a half later, a sense of urgency is back again as another publication from the IPCC (IPCC, 2023) is marking the context of the writing of this review. But one might ask, is this ever-increasing and periodically recurring sense of urgency ever going to be addressed in a meaningful way? The effect of an increased sense of urgency seems to be a hardening of discourse where calls for action can sometimes morph into violent incidents. Such displays of frustration are understandable given the urgency combined with perceived (and real) inaction of industry actors and policy makers. However, such discord will likely cause further division and make us increasingly unable to foster the society-wide collaboration needed to safeguard against the worst consequences of climate change.
According to the authors, one main cause of the inability of our governments to present meaningful and feasible low-carbon transition pathways is due to the prevalence of integrated assessment models. Although useful, these draw mainly on economic and engineering knowledge and are too abstract and oversimplified. This approach overlooks social realities e.g. actor’s beliefs and behaviours, as well as the workings of real-world policy making, institutions, and technology implementation processes. To remedy this, the authors create an analytical path towards transitions that are based not on narrow technical reform or grand but over-simplified roadmaps to revolution, but instead towards reconfiguration. Their stated goal is to transcend a ‘stale dichotomy’ of cool market liberalism on one hand versus dramatic and naïve ideological approaches to sustainability and climate discourse on the other.
This path of reconfiguration is a culmination of the authors’ combined decades-long work within the extensive field of socio-technical transitions research. This is underpinned by the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP). The authors situate their book in contrasting continuation of the somewhat revolutionary oriented and very macro and longitudinal perspective of Polanyi’s (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. The goal here is to field MLP in a way that is more substantial in terms of scope and depth than what we are usually accustomed to (i.e. specific socio-technical conditions and landscapes).
The main empirical contribution of the book takes the form of three chapters, each providing a ‘longitudinal multidecadal’ analysis of the unfolding low-carbon transitions in the UK electricity, heat, and mobility systems respectively. The book also contributes a detailed overview of current MLP state-of-the-art, with relevant adjustments made for the current endeavour. This provides both a solid introduction to new readers as well as an update for intermediates. The studies and the cross-cutting analysis and conclusions at the end can probably be enjoyed separately, thus making it a suitable read for industry actors and policy makers looking for a comprehensive longitudinal analysis of the electricity, heat and mobility systems in the UK as well.
The book’s conclusions give a comprehensive overview of the state of transition, in terms of progress of reconfiguration of the three energy sectors. The analysis is divided into scope and depth of techno-economic, actor, and policy reconfiguration. This provides a summary of each of the contributions made to the reconfiguration of each sector and lists them according to MLP terms. For example: niche-innovations, where novel technologies have entered into the mainstream (e.g. heat-pumps, EVs), or system substitution, where for instance a switch in fuel sources have been made (e.g. from coal to gas). Also indicated are the many niches, substitutions and improvements that are not fully exploited yet and where transformative potential remain, such as battery storage, retrofitting, or car sharing.
Cutting across the three sectors gives insights into the scope and depth of the reconfiguration of each sector. This provides a clear indication of each sector’s achievements and remaining potential. In the electricity sector, the authors find that many of the transformative elements introduced have been in accordance with industry and policy incumbency. For example: large-scale wind and PV has been preferred to small-scale, smart grids have enabled flexibility but very little in terms of peer-to-peer trading and micro-grids, and flexibility markets still provide mostly large-scale backup rather than exploiting domestic demand side response. In other words, the scope is wide but the depth remains underemphasized so the sector’s potential is underutilised. This finding is representative of most of the categories for mobility and heating as well. This means that low-hanging fruit in a mostly business-as-usual modus operandi seems to have been the norm thus far. Although it has produced some positive results, continuing along these lines may be coming close to exhausting most transformative potential. This suggests that both more industry initiative and stronger policy support are required. As the authors make clear, the carbon reduction potential of going beyond current achievements is unquestionably substantial. In sum, the Great Reconfiguration is still only beginning, the end point of which will elicit changes both high in scope and depth.
Rather than simply pointing out the prevalence of incumbency and lock-in mechanisms of vested interests, the authors provide a solid terminology for identifying and managing mechanisms that can increase momentum of emerging innovations and weaken system lock-ins in terms of techno-economic, actors, and policy. For instance, momentum-increasing examples include better technology or performance improvements (techno-economic); enrolling more and varied groups of actors; and changing policy strategies or implementing support structures. Weakening lock-in is represented by increasing cost or exploiting failure of incumbent technology where loss of legitimacy can cause actors to disband from industry networks, or changes in electoral politics or policy goals. Many examples are provided in the book. For instance, the momentum in the mobility sector of EVs was aided by falling costs of batteries and the 2016 Dieselgate (where car manufacturers were exposed for being less than truthful about vehicle emissions). Another example is the rapid modal shift from cars to other transport modes such as bus and cycling in London, driven by such mechanisms as political leadership and introduction of the Oyster Card (a digital payment system for the public transport system) in combination with weakened lock-in represented by the rising discontent caused by congestion and parking problems.
Implementing socio-technical transitions means change makers must always keep an eye on windows of opportunity. The Great Reconfiguration means change actors must learn to ride a wave of opportunity and failure in a timely fashion. Although the authors do not provide a recipe for success per se, they do give a very comprehensive overview of what does and does not work, as well as an exhaustive terminology for describing the mechanisms and actors involved. The strength of this approach lies in its consistent admission of setbacks as well as success, thus insisting on a symmetrical approach to the socio-technical phenomenon that is transition. Admitting that there will be setbacks also means that setbacks sometimes work in our favour.
It is incumbent upon responsible actors to exploit every opportunity that presents itself, as well as nurturing change where market liberal incentives simply do not. In an academic setting, the MLP still provides a useful taxonomy to describe and understand transitions, but perhaps its usefulness can be further exploited within the sphere of policy making and public discourse. As indicated in this review, we are in dire need of meaningful narratives of change that are as convincing about feasibility as they are truthful about setbacks. This could bridge the gap between the rational and the passionate, ultimately contributing to the possibility of a semblance of concerted effort at the eleventh hour.
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, US. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.
IPCC. (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Polanyi, Karl. (1944). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
5th Anniversary Essays
These commissioned essays from Buildings & Cities' authors and readers explore how the research landscape is changing. New essays are continuously being added to the collection during 2024 as part of B&C's anniversary.
Collectively, these essays offer fresh insights into the processes and issues that are currently inadequate or missing in the built environment research landscape. A wide perspective from different disciplines and geographies creates a positive, collective vision for shaping the research agenda. Recommendations are made for what needs to change.
We hope this will provoke and inspire research funders, researchers and other stakeholders to discuss, reflect and act. Ideas range from systemic change to key research questions to improving engagement to change of focus.
The Challenges of Evidence-Based Design
While some progress has been made, particularly in areas like healing architecture where the impact of design on human well-being is more directly observable, much work remains to be done to extend evidence-based design to broader fields of architecture, urban planning and design. Meta Berghauser Pont (Chalmers University of Technology) explains the challenges and pathways needed for a shift toward evidence-based design in urban planning and urban design.