Journal Metrics

Journal evaluation and impact

Scopus Citescore for 2023: 5.4

  • #17/189 in Engineering: Architecture (91st percentile = Q1)
  • #45/279 in Social Sciences: Urban Studies (82nd percentile –Q1)
  • #141/821 in Social Sciences: Geography, Planning and Development (82nd percentile = Q1)
  • #51/223 in Engineering: Building and Construction (77th percentile = Q1)
  • #54/219 in Environmental Science (miscellaneous) (75th percentile = Q1) 
  • #115/399 in Environmental Science: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (71st percentile = Q2)

Scimago h-index:  17 (2023)
Scimago Journal Rank: 0.817 (2023) (Q1; ranked 9th out of 169)

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ): Seal of Approval

Finnish Publication Forum (JUFO): level 2

Content metrics

Peer-reviewed content in the 2023 volume:
Submissions received 1 119
Reviews requested 2 713
Reviews received 3 304
Total Rejections 4 58
Acceptances 5 53
Acceptance rate 6 48%
Peer-reviewed papers - Time to publication in 2023:
Time from submission to first decision 7 62 days
Time from submission to acceptance 8 109 days

Definitions

1 Number of new articles received by the journal

2 Number of peer review invitation emails that were sent out

3 Number of completed peer review reports received

4 Total number of articles rejected (including desk rejects)

5 Number of articles that received a 'Accept for publication' decision

6 Number of acceptances, as a percentage, against the total number of final decisions

7 'Mean' average from submission to first decision for all publications in the volume

8 'Mean' average from submission to acceptance for all publications in the volume (includes revision & second review)

Latest Commentaries

Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities

As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.

Artwork © Pat Sonnino 2024

Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.