
www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/energy-sufficiency-si.html
How can conditions be created for decent living standards for all without exceeding planetary limits?
Energy and climate policies have tended to focus on the promotion of energy efficiency and renewable energies, but there is no evidence that these measures alone will be able to meet climate and sustainable development goals. This special issue explores what the concept of sufficiency means for the built environment - both as a floor (minimum) and a ceiling (maximum) to ensure a "good life". Sufficiency is explored in many interconnected issues such as land use and density, space usage (size and adaptability), sharing of goods, services and spaces, and space conditioning (heating, cooling and ventilation) for health.
Guest editors: Tina Fawcett, Sarah Darby & Marlyne Sahakian
The papers in this special issue contribute to shared understandings around sufficiency among diverse actors including professionals and members of civil society; how studies aim at assessing the potential of sufficiency measures; what efforts are being made to learn from and build on existing sufficiency measures, as well as initiatives that seek to experiment with sufficiency; and what conceptual advances are being put forward relevant to sufficiency research and action.
In addition to energy, some papers in this special issue focus on one of the most difficult discussions around sufficiency in housing: reducing housing space per person. It is feasible to frame sufficiency as a way to promote wellbeing and the good life i.e. live better while consuming less.
Other papers help to chart future directions for research and action by relating to theories of justice, focusing on elite consumption, or considering ways to engage in sufficiency with existing material and institutional arrangements.
There is likely to be increased demand for reliable basic modern energy services from hundreds of millions of people who do not yet have access to them. How can these be met in ways that avoid the huge environmental and social costs of the last two centuries? The question of justice is integral to these reflections, particularly justice in recognition - of vulnerabilities, of limited agency, and of unacknowledged over- and under-consumption
Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M.
Sahakian, T. Fawcett &
S.
Darby
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M. Lehner, J.
L. Richter, H. Kreinin, P. Mamut, E. Vadovics, J. Henman, O. Mont & D.
Fuchs
Are people willing to share space? Household preferences in Finland
E. Ruokamo,
E. Kylkilahti, M. Lettenmeier & A. Toppinen
Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J. Bouillet & C. Grandclément
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O. Moynat
& M. Sahakian
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L. K. Aagaard & T. H.
Christensen
'Rightsize': a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P. Graham, P.
Nourian, E. Warwick & M. Gath-Morad
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z. M. Subin,
J. Lombardi, R. Muralidharan, J. Korn, J. Malik, T. Pullen, M. Wei &
Tianzhen Hong
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A. Lall &
G. Sethi
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I. Fouiteh,
J. D. Cabrera Santelices, A. Susini & M. K. Patel
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M. Bagheri,
L. Roth, L. Siebke, C. Rohde & H.-J. Linke
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A. Huber, H.
Heinrichs & M. Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G. van
Moeseke, D. De Grave, A. Anciaux, J. Sobczak & G. Wallenborn
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
Alice Guilbert
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M. Koch, K. Emilsson, J. Lee & H. Johansson
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T. H. Christensen, L. K. Aagaard, A.K. Juvik, C. Samson & K. Gram-Hanssen
Timing matters: life cycle embodied GHG emissions of circular building strategies
A Wöhler, L Rosado, H Abu Ghaida, H Wallbaum & A Hollberg
Scaling up retrofit: regional challenges and opportunities for MMC
H Dörr, P Späth & I Goñi
Design as communicative activity: implications for sustainability assessment software
T Säwén, A Sasic Kalagasidis & A Hollberg
Indoor temperature and office work performance in a temperate climate
T Kramer & S Schiavon
Moving homes and energy poverty: residents’ concerns, capabilities and responses
M Jalas, J Rinkinen, S Numminen & E Valkealahti
Reference study for biogenic carbon storage in the residential building stock
O Iliescu, I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Building space heating and cooling in NDCs 4.0
T P Lützkendorf
Building component reuse as sociomaterial interaction: lessons from precast concrete
J Uusikartano, L Alkki & V Capitani
Validating national reuse indicators from regional demolition data: a Swedish example
F Ericsson, K Mjörnell & U Janson
Climate change risk and decision-making [editorial]
S Foxell & I Cooper
Technologies of reconstruction [editorial]
P Tombesi
Urban form metrics for building occupancy modelling: applications and impacts
D Reiter, M Jehling & R Hecht
Retrofit realism: affordable low-carbon policies for existing homes
N Eyre & R Khosla

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Practitioners’ Views of POE
Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is widely valued but weakly embedded in practice. Ant Marsh, Kate van Someren, Lara Clarke and Tom Randall (Arup Building Performance and Commissioning Services) explain the findings from a survey and focus groups with UK construction industry practitioners. They identified fragmented responsibility, split commercial incentives and a persistent fear of “bad news”. Making POE routine requires a shift from producing reports to a focus on improving outcomes by owning and acting on learning.
Who is Responsible for Climate Change?
Ian Cooper (Eclipse Research) explores the questions of responsibility raised in the recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Climate Change Risk and Decision-Making’. Focusing here on carbon emissions and mitigation, global responses will require grounding in what can work locally. New responsibilities arise for the wide range of built environment decision-makers: clients, professionals and their institutions, central and local governments, product suppliers, financiers, insurers, etc. A framework is needed to manage the complexity of responsibilities especially for variety of actors, the time frames and spatial scales.