Welcome to the B&C COMMUNITY WEBSITE | Visit the B&C JOURNAL WEBSITE

www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/health-inequalities-indoor-environments.html

Health Inequalities and Indoor Environments

Health Inequalities and Indoor Environments

How do indoor environments affect health inequalities, inequities and injustice?

Health inequalities are a crucial aspect of public health and a pressing societal challenge. Access to healthy indoor spaces that are optimised to promote health should be seen as a fundamental right for all. This special issue is a starting point for the built-environment and public health communities to identify many existing inequities in order to improve methodological approaches, share vocabularies between disciplines, and create new knowledge necessary to create a safe and healthy indoor environments for all. Equitable design could translate into prioritising air quality improvements in the homes of people suffering from respiratory conditions, introducing inclusive design elements for disabled people, or providing energy retrofit subsidies to low-income, fuel-poor households.

Guest editors: Anna Mavrogianni & Marcella Ucci

There is compelling evidence that aspects of indoor environments, e.g. thermal, visual, acoustic conditions and air quality, can adversely affect health, but the role of indoor environments in health inequalities is less understood.

One fundamental question for public health and built-environment research is understanding how and to what extent indoor environments act as effect modifiers of structural inequalities or of other intermediary factors (e.g. outdoor conditions). This would then help address the other fundamental question: which pathways or levers pertaining indoor environments may be most effective at removing inequalities and delivering health equity?

The terms 'health inequality', 'health equity' and 'social determinants of health' deserve explanation.  Health inequality refers to mapping and understanding health disparities and their root causes. This can refer to differences in health status (e.g. life expectancy) but also in access to or quality of healthcare services, as well as differences in risky health behaviours (e.g. smoking) and, more broadly, differences in the wider 'social determinants of health'. The latter are deeply intertwined with the notion of health inequalities, framing health as a social phenomenon and emphasising how an individual's (or a group's) position in society plays a central role in health inequities. The most important structural stratifiers and their proxy indicators include: income, education, occupation, social class, gender and race/ethnicity (WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health). Several 'intermediary determinants' shape health outcomes-these include 'material circumstances', such as indoor (and outdoor) environmental conditions where people live and work. The term 'equity' refers to the principles that should guide the identification of potential 'fair' solutions.

The papers published in this special issue illustrate what can be achieved by integrating different methods (e.g. building stock modelling and focus groups) and data sources (e.g. Energy Performance Certificates and mental health data). Beyond their specific findings, the papers are a significant and novel contribution to the literature by providing a blueprint for the successful synthesis of methods and materials originally produced by different disciplines and sectors, and discussing the challenges and opportunities of their respective study designs and approaches.

Table of contents

Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M. Ucci & A. Mavrogianni

Assessing retrofit policies for fuel-poor homes in London
M. C. Georgiadou, D. Greenwood, R. Schiano-Phan & F. Russo

IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C. Smith, A. Drinkwater, M. Modlich, D. van der Horst & R. Doherty

Linking housing, sociodemographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P. Symonds, C. H. Simpson, G. Petrou, L. Ferguson, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies

Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K. Govertsen & M. Kane

A population-level framework to estimate unequal indoor heat and air-pollution exposure
R. Cole, C. Simpson, L. Ferguson, P. Symonds, J. Taylor, C. Heaviside, P. Murage, H. Macintyre, S. Hajat, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki

Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers

Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva

Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur

Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang

How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang

Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino

Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe

Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori

Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings

Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer

Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne

Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali

Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison

Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka

eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg

Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

Post-disaster reconstruction: infill housing prototypes for Kathmandu
J Bolchover & K Mundle

Urban verticalisation: typologies of high-rise development in Santiago
D Moreno-Alba, C Marmolejo-Duarte, M Vicuña del Río & C Aguirre-Núñez

A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A Apostu & M Drăghici

Reconstruction in post-war Rome: transnational flows and national identity
J Jiang

Reframing disaster recovery through spatial justice: an integrated framework
M A Gasseloğlu & J E Gonçalves

Tracking energy signatures of British homes from 2020 to 2025
C Hanmer, J Few, F Hollick, S Elam & T Oreszczyn

Spatial (in)justice shaping the home as a space of work
D Milián Bernal, J Laitinen, H Shevchenko, O Ivanova, S Pelsmakers & E Nisonen

Working at home: tactics to reappropriate the home
D Milián Bernal, S Pelsmakers, E Nisonen & J Vanhatalo

Living labs and building testing labs: enabling climate change adaptation
J Hugo & M Farhadian

Energy sufficiency, space temperature and public policy
J Morley

Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes
J M Müller

Towards a universal framework for heat pump monitoring at scale
J Crawley, L Domoney, A O’Donovan, J Wingfield, C Dinu, O Kinnane, P O’Sullivan

See all peer reviewed articles

Latest Commentaries

Reimagining Climate Action, Community Engagement and Professional Responsibility

Climate change poses a plethora of challenges for decision- and policy-making on multiple scales. Adopting a risk perspective can identify multiple kinds of risk that must be addressed if climate action is to be successful. John Robinson and Emily Smit (University of Toronto), Pamela Robinson (Toronto Metropolitan University) and Anne Gloger (Catalysts’ Circle) consider the decision-making risks having to do with whether climate mitigation and adaptation policies and programs are likely to achieve their goals.

COP30 Report

COP30 Report

Matti Kuittinen (Aalto University) reflects on his experience of attending the 2025 UN Conference of the Parties in Belém, Brazil. The roadmaps and commitments failed to deliver the objectives of the 2025 Paris Agreement. However, 2 countries - Japan and Senegal - announced they are creating roadmaps to decarbonise their buildings. An international group of government ministers put housing on the agenda - specifying the need for reduced carbon and energy use along with affordability, quality and climate resilience.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.

We will not share your email with third parties. Read more