How do indoor environments affect health inequalities, inequities and injustice?
Health inequalities are a crucial aspect of public health and a pressing societal challenge. Access to healthy indoor spaces that are optimised to promote health should be seen as a fundamental right for all. This special issue is a starting point for the built-environment and public health communities to identify many existing inequities in order to improve methodological approaches, share vocabularies between disciplines, and create new knowledge necessary to create a safe and healthy indoor environments for all. Equitable design could translate into prioritising air quality improvements in the homes of people suffering from respiratory conditions, introducing inclusive design elements for disabled people, or providing energy retrofit subsidies to low-income, fuel-poor households.
Guest editors: Anna Mavrogianni & Marcella Ucci
There is compelling evidence that aspects of indoor environments, e.g. thermal, visual, acoustic conditions and air quality, can adversely affect health, but the role of indoor environments in health inequalities is less understood.
One fundamental question for public health and built-environment research is understanding how and to what extent indoor environments act as effect modifiers of structural inequalities or of other intermediary factors (e.g. outdoor conditions). This would then help address the other fundamental question: which pathways or levers pertaining indoor environments may be most effective at removing inequalities and delivering health equity?
The terms ‘health inequality’, ‘health equity’ and ‘social determinants of health’ deserve explanation. Health inequality refers to mapping and understanding health disparities and their root causes. This can refer to differences in health status (e.g. life expectancy) but also in access to or quality of healthcare services, as well as differences in risky health behaviours (e.g. smoking) and, more broadly, differences in the wider ‘social determinants of health’. The latter are deeply intertwined with the notion of health inequalities, framing health as a social phenomenon and emphasising how an individual’s (or a group’s) position in society plays a central role in health inequities. The most important structural stratifiers and their proxy indicators include: income, education, occupation, social class, gender and race/ethnicity (WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health). Several ‘intermediary determinants’ shape health outcomes—these include ‘material circumstances’, such as indoor (and outdoor) environmental conditions where people live and work. The term ‘equity’ refers to the principles that should guide the identification of potential ‘fair’ solutions.
The papers published in this special issue illustrate what can be achieved by integrating different methods (e.g. building stock modelling and focus groups) and data sources (e.g. Energy Performance Certificates and mental health data). Beyond their specific findings, the papers are a significant and novel contribution to the literature by providing a blueprint for the successful synthesis of methods and materials originally produced by different disciplines and sectors, and discussing the challenges and opportunities of their respective study designs and approaches.
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M. Ucci & A.
Mavrogianni
Assessing retrofit policies for fuel-poor homes in London
M. C. Georgiadou, D.
Greenwood, R. Schiano-Phan & F. Russo
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C. Smith, A.
Drinkwater, M. Modlich, D. van der Horst & R. Doherty
Linking housing, sociodemographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P. Symonds, C. H.
Simpson, G. Petrou, L. Ferguson, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K. Govertsen &
M. Kane
A population-level framework to estimate unequal indoor heat and air-pollution exposure
R. Cole, C. Simpson,
L. Ferguson, P. Symonds, J. Taylor, C. Heaviside, P. Murage, H. Macintyre, S.
Hajat, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development
I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Energy sufficiency in buildings and cities: current research, future directions [editorial]
M Sahakian, T Fawcett & S Darby
Sufficiency, consumption patterns and limits: a survey of French households
J Bouillet & C Grandclément
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M Ucci & A Mavrogianni
Operationalising energy sufficiency for low-carbon built environments in urbanising India
A B Lall & G Sethi
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
T H Christensen, L K Aagaard, A K Juvik, C Samson & K Gram-Hanssen
Culture change in the UK construction industry: an anthropological perspective
I Tellam
Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland
E Ruokamo, E Kylkilahti, M Lettenmeier & A Toppinen
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
M Moisio, E Salmio, T Kaasalainen, S Huuhka, A Räsänen, J Lahdensivu, M Leppänen & P Kuula
A population-level framework to estimate unequal exposure to indoor heat and air pollution
R Cole, C H Simpson, L Ferguson, P Symonds, J Taylor, C Heaviside, P Murage, H L Macintyre, S Hajat, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Finnish glazed balconies: residents’ experience, wellbeing and use
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa, S Kilpeläinen & S Pelsmakers
Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis
C C Nwagwu, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Mapping municipal land policies: applications of flexible zoning for densification
V Götze, J-D Gerber & M Jehling
Energy sufficiency and recognition justice: a study of household consumption
A Guilbert
Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P Symonds, C H Simpson, G Petrou, L Ferguson, A Mavrogianni & M Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K Govertsen & M Kane
Provide or prevent? Exploring sufficiency imaginaries within Danish systems of provision
L K Aagaard & T H Christensen
Imagining sufficiency through collective changes as satisfiers
O Moynat & M Sahakian
US urban land-use reform: a strategy for energy sufficiency
Z M Subin, J Lombardi, R Muralidharan, J Korn, J Malik, T Pullen, M Wei & T Hong
Mapping supply chains for energy retrofit
F Wade & Y Han
Operationalising building-related energy sufficiency measures in SMEs
I Fouiteh, J D Cabrera Santelices, A Susini & M K Patel
Promoting neighbourhood sharing: infrastructures of convenience and community
A Huber, H Heinrichs & M Jaeger-Erben
New insights into thermal comfort sufficiency in dwellings
G van Moeseke, D de Grave, A Anciaux, J Sobczak & G Wallenborn
‘Rightsize’: a housing design game for spatial and energy sufficiency
P Graham, P Nourian, E Warwick & M Gath-Morad
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle
M Bagheri, L Roth, L Siebke, C Rohde & H-J Linke
The jobs of climate adaptation
T Denham, L Rickards & O Ajulo
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites
M Koch, K Emilsson, J Lee & H Johansson
Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
B Viriyaroj, M Kuittinen & S H Gheewala
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C Smith, A Drinkwater, M Modlich, D van der Horst & R Doherty
Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU
M Lehner, J L Richter, H Kreinin, P Mamut, E Vadovics, J Henman, O Mont & D Fuchs
Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation [editorial]
V Castán-Broto, M Olazabal & G Ziervogel
Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: did much change?
F Hollick, D Humphrey, T Oreszczyn, C Elwell & G Huebner
Evaluating past and future building operational emissions: improved method
S Huuhka, M Moisio & M Arnould
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
Latest Commentaries
Systems Thinking is Needed to Achieve Sustainable Cities
As city populations grow, a critical current and future challenge for urban researchers is to provide compelling evidence of the medium and long-term co-benefits of quality, low-carbon affordable housing and compact urban design. Philippa Howden-Chapman (University of Otago) and Ralph Chapman (Victoria University of Wellington) explain why systems-based, transition-oriented research on housing and associated systemic benefits is needed now more than ever.
Unmaking Cities Can Catalyse Sustainable Transformations
Andrew Karvonen (Lund University) explains why innovation has limitations for achieving systemic change. What is also needed is a process of unmaking (i.e. phasing out existing harmful technologies, processes and practices) whilst ensuring inequalities, vulnerabilities and economic hazards are avoided. Researchers have an important role to identify what needs dismantling, identify advantageous and negative impacts and work with stakeholders and local governments.